Answers · Results & grading
What are the three verdicts?
Consistent, Inconclusive and Flagged. They describe authorship evidence, not guilt.
609 reads
The verdict answers one question: how well does the interview support this student being the author of this work? It is deliberately a statement about evidence, not a finding of misconduct.
| Verdict | What it means | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Consistent (안전) | The student explained their work the way an author would. Nothing contradicted the submission. | Nothing. Grade as normal. |
| Inconclusive (주의) | The interview did not settle it either way. Usually that means a very short answer set, a technical problem, or a quiet student. | Look at the transcript. Consider a retry rather than a conclusion. |
| Flagged (검토 필요) | Something specific did not line up: the student could not account for choices in their own submission. | Read the cited quotes and decide. This is a prompt to look, not a conclusion. |
Flagged is not an accusation
Treat it as "worth a conversation". A nervous student, an unusual speech pattern or a bad connection can all produce a flag. The evidence is there so you can judge, and you are the one who judges.
This is one page of the documentation inside Viva.
Instructors get the rest — the walkthroughs, the screenshots, and Ask Viva, which finds the right page from a typed question.