Our mission

Education should prove
understanding, not just output.

We built Viva because a submitted essay is not evidence of comprehension. A conversation is.

미션

교육은 결과물이 아니라
이해를 증명해야 해요.

제출된 에세이는 이해의 증거가 아니에요. 대화가 증거예요. 그래서 Viva를 만들었어요.

The manifesto

Three commitments.

01

For students ·
Empower

Every student to own their learning out loud, through conversation rather than just submission.

02

For instructors ·
Equip

Every instructor to see what each of their students truly understands.

03

For education ·
Establish

A new standard for assessment in the AI era, built on intellectual honesty, not surveillance.

저희의 약속

세 가지를 약속드려요.

01

학생을 위해 ·
학생의 목소리

모든 학생이 자신의 사고를 직접 말로 풀어낼 수 있는 자리를 만들어요.

02

선생님을 위해 ·
선생님의 시야

학생 한 명 한 명이 진짜로 무엇을 이해하는지 보실 수 있도록 도와드려요.

03

교육을 위해 ·
교육의 미래

AI 시대의 평가를 감시가 아닌 지적 정직함 위에 다시 세워요.

The problem

The gap between submission and understanding is growing

For centuries, a submitted piece of work was imperfect proof — but it was something. AI-generated content has severed even that thin tether. Today, a student can submit a sophisticated, well-structured essay without having read the source material, formed an opinion, or engaged meaningfully with the subject.

Plagiarism detection is playing catch-up with increasingly capable generation tools and losing. Similarity scores and AI detectors produce false positives, miss sophisticated paraphrasing, and don't tell you whether the student actually understands what they submitted. They answer the wrong question.

The right question is not "Did this student write this?" It is "Does this student understand this?" And the only reliable way to answer that is to ask them, in real time, out loud.

What we built

An oral assessment layer that works at scale

Viva holds structured, personalized AI voice conversations after assignment submission. Each conversation is tailored to the student's own work — the questions, the follow-ups, the probes — so every one is unique. The AI surfaces moments worth an instructor's attention.

The result is not a new grade. It is a verified signal layered on top of existing assessment: a structured report for the instructor, targeted feedback for the student, and a portable Viva Card the student can carry forward as proof of demonstrated understanding.

Oral assessment is the oldest and most trusted form of evaluation in education. We are not reinventing it. We are making it accessible to every instructor, in every class, at every scale.

Where we are going

A world where every student's understanding can be verified

Our long-term vision is a credential layer for education — one where demonstrated understanding is portable, verifiable, and trusted across institutions. A student who aced a Viva session on climate policy in Year 10 should be able to carry that forward. A university admissions team should be able to examine the actual evidence, not just the grade on the transcript.

That future requires a standard. Viva is building toward it — one classroom, one conversation, one verified Viva Card at a time.

What we believe

The principles we build by

🧠

Understanding first

Grades measure output. We measure comprehension. There is a difference, and it matters.

🎙️

Voice is the proof

Speaking reveals what writing can hide. A student who truly understands can explain, question, and defend their thinking in real time.

🔬

Rigorous but human

AI handles the heavy lifting. Instructors set the standards. Students get feedback that actually helps them grow.

🔒

Privacy by design

Student data is not a product. Every design decision starts with the question: would a parent be comfortable with this?

🌍

Equity of access

Oral assessment has historically belonged to elite institutions. We are making it available to every classroom, anywhere.

Honest about AI

We use AI openly and document it clearly. We believe schools deserve to understand the tools they're trusting with their students.

저희의 믿음

저희가 만들 때 따르는 원칙

🧠

이해가 먼저예요

성적은 결과물을 측정해요. 저희는 이해를 측정해요. 둘은 다르고, 그 차이가 중요해요.

🎙️

목소리가 증거예요

말하기는 글이 숨길 수 있는 걸 드러내요. 정말로 이해한 학생은 자신의 생각을 실시간으로 설명하고, 질문하고, 옹호할 수 있어요.

🔬

엄격하지만 따뜻하게

AI가 무거운 일을 처리해요. 교사가 기준을 세워요. 학생은 진짜로 도움이 되는 피드백을 받아요.

🔒

설계 단계부터 프라이버시

학생 데이터는 상품이 아니에요. 모든 설계는 "학부모가 이걸 보고 안심할 수 있을까?"라는 질문에서 시작해요.

🌍

평등한 접근

구술 평가는 역사적으로 엘리트 기관의 전유물이었어요. 저희는 그걸 어디에 있는 어떤 교실에서도 쓸 수 있게 만들고 있어요.

AI에 대해 솔직하게

저희는 AI를 투명하게 사용하고, 명확하게 문서화해요. 학교는 자신들이 학생에게 사용하는 도구를 이해할 자격이 있어요.

Built by educators, researchers, and engineers.

We are a small team obsessed with the problem of authentic learning in an AI-saturated world. If that obsession sounds familiar, we'd love to hear from you.

교사, 연구자, 엔지니어가 함께 만들어요.

AI로 가득한 세상에서 진정한 학습이 무엇인지 깊이 고민하는 작은 팀이에요. 같은 고민을 하고 계신다면, 꼭 연락 주세요.